There was a time when too many museums in Florence seemed stuck in a time warp: they were becoming museum pieces in themselves. There seemed to be no dynamic curatorship, few up-to-date guides, no provisions for children’s activities, no special events and the same rooms ‘under restoration’ since time immemorial.
The change since we first began visiting Florence in the 1980’s has been remarkable. There is a new awareness, a revaluation of the city’s extraordinary cultural heritage, management has been reorganized, and the introduction of digital technology for matters from bookings to virtual visits has changed everything. Nowhere is this transformation more visible than in the Museo dell’Opera Del Duomo, the museum dedicated to Florence’s cathedral, Santa Maria del Fiore. Completely renovated in 2015 it is one of the city’s most spectacular museums.
The entrance is through a spacious hall leading to a passageway with the names of those involved in building the cathedral carved on a wall.
We come face to face with Florence’s cathedral’s greatest treasure, the unfinished Michaelangelo Pietà now being restored. (I wish I could have seen the restorers at work).
We then enter a vast space where the original, uncompleted gothic facade of the Duomo has been reconstructed on a 1 to 1 scale.
A curator told me that this exhibit alone cost half the funds spent on the museum’s refurbishment. It was this facade that was torn down to be replaced, it was hoped, by a newly designed one. For almost four centuries this never occurred until in the nineteenth century there was final agreement on the present frontage as a result of a competition. Although clearly it would have been better if the original design had been completed the present facade is more suitable for a gothic building transitioning into the renaissance than the various abandoned baroque projects.
Why have so many churches in Florence (and, indeed, in Italy – Milan Cathedral’s front was only completed in the nineteenth century, for example) had problems in completing their facades. Of the great churches Santa Maria Novella is the only one with a frontage which was completed during the renaissance when Alberti built upon the uncompleted Romanesque section and finished it off with those graceful volutes which became a hallmark of many subsequent churches.
Santa Croce, the huge Franciscan church, only had its front added in the late nineteenth century. The two great Brunelleschi-designed churches of San Lorenzo and Santo Spirito have no completed facades and Santa Maria del Carmine, with its great Masaccio frescoes, presents a similarly raw frontage.
What was the problem? Perhaps it’s because the facades were the last part of the churches to be built by which time funds could have run out, or perhaps styles may have changed in fashion and nobody could agree on how to complete the last part of their church.
A considerable part of the museum is devoted to this thorny issue as can be seen from the models of the facade designs submitted through the centuries before the present scheme was finally approved.
It’s significant to note that not all Italian cities have had this problem with their churches. For example, Siena, Orvieto and Spoleto completed their wonderful cathedral facades in gothic or early renaissance times.
Other sections of Florence’s museum house the original sculptures from Giotto’s bell-tower (the ones one sees on the campanile are reproductions).
Ghiberti’s miraculous doors of paradise are here too (again what one sees on the baptistery are copies).
A considerable part of the display is devoted to the revolutionary way Brunelleschi built the famous cupola without the use of centring form work or flying buttresses. The concept of a dome within a dome was one that Wren also took up when he came to build London’s St Pauls cathedral.
For me the most beautiful part of the museum was the section dealing with the cantorie or choir stalls for the cathedral. On one side is Luca Della Robbia’s design with its wonderful groups of angelic singers.
On the other side is Donatello’s more classical version. Both are quite exquisite.
Again there is a mystery for me here. Why were these beautiful features removed from the cathedral? Was it because choirs became larger and required more space which only the apse could supply? Or was it just a change in fashions. I do not even know when the cantorie were removed. Certainly the interior of Florence cathedral presents a somewhat bare appearance when compared, say, to the sumptuousness of Siena cathedral.
Because of the pandemic not all the building is open. There is a top floor viewing terrace which remains closed. However, there is so much to see and appreciate in this exemplary museum that I remained very pleased with my visit.


































































